Bahá’í World/Volume 33/Response to In Larger Freedom

←Previous

The Bahá’í World Volume 33

Next→

[Page 271]

Response to In Larger Freedom

7776 Babzi’z’ International Community’s response to t/ae Secretary—Gmeml} report

In Larger Freedom: Towards Development, Security, and Human Rights for All. Submitted to #76 United Nation: Nongovernmental Liaison Service

New York, 30 April 2005.

he Bahé’l’ International Community welcomes the oppor—

tunity to offer comments and observations on the Secretary

General’s report to the General Assembly titled, “In Larger Freedom: Towards Development, Security, and Human Rights for All,” in the hopes of stirring further reflection, debate, and action. We understand the processes of UN reform as part of an organic, evolutionary course characterized by increasing levels of integra— tion and unity in governance structures and processes. In this light, we are encouraged by the report’s holistic approach—stressing the interdependence of development, freedom, and peace; emphasizing human solidarity as the basis for effective and sustainable solutions to global Challenges; and presenting a bold vision of new mechanisms and methods of work for the organization. We offer comments on each section of the report in turn.

Freedom from want

MILLENNIUM DEVELOPMENT GOALS (3 28—32)

The Bahé’l’ International Community welcomes the efforts of the United Nations to set forth concrete goals for development, in the form of the MDGS, which seek to focus the work of the organization

271

[Page 272]272 THE BAHA’I’ WORLD 2004—2005

with the aim of restoring justice and dignity to every human life. Material goals in themselves, however, are not sufficient to inspire and sustain processes of comprehensive development at the local, national, and global levels. Equally important are aims to foster universal participation in the development processes, the develop— ment of individual capabilities to contribute to these processes, and the application of moral and intellectual resources from the fields of science and religion—two knowledge systems that have propelled our progress over the centuries. Ultimately, each individual, With the benefit of access to education, must be regarded as a protagonist in his or her own development and that of the community.

Alongside the concrete development targets set by the MDGs, it is imperative to attend to the realization of moral or spiritual principles needed for constructive development. At the heart ofsuch principles is the understanding that human nature is essentially spiritual and that a vision ofdevelopment must be responsive to this reality. These principles may include: fostering unity in diversity, equity, justice, gender equality, moral leadership, and freedom of thought.‘

Efforts to eradicate poverty must be accompanied by an earnest re—evaluation of global systems and processes—including governance, trade, and the private sector—that perpetuate the growing extremes of wealth and poverty. Specifically, there is a need for strong bind— ing corporate rules at the national and international levels. Greater corporate accountability must not be restricted to the environment and labor standards but must also take into account the full panoply of human rights.

GENDER (5 40)

We strongly support the promotion of gender equality as a prerequi— site to development. Emphasis should be placed on the substantive involvement of women at all stages of peace—building and conflict resolution efforts, particularly postconflict reconstruction. As women are intimately aware of the needs of their families and communities, plans for transition to a peaceful society must include their critical perspectives. Indeed, only as women take their rightful place in de— cision making at all levels will the moral and psychological climate favorable to the establishment of peace emerge.

[Page 273]RESPONSE TO IN LARGER FREEDOM 273

Freedom from fear

The Bahé’i International Community welcomes the report’s more comprehensive vision of collective security, based on the understand— ing that in our interconnected world, a threat to one State is a threat to all. The Bahé’l’ Faith envisions a system of collective security within a framework of global federation, in which national borders have been conclusively defined and in whose favor all nations of the world Will have willingly ceded Claims to make war.

DEFINITION OF TERRORISM (5 91)

We support the Secretary—General’s call for member states to adopt a definition of terrorism and to conclude a comprehensive convention on terrorism. We agree with the Secretary-General’s characterization of terrorism as any action, “intended to cause death or serious bodily harm to civilians or non—combatants With the purpose of intimidat- ing a population or compelling a Government or an international organization to do or abstain from doing any act.” Moreover, prob- lems such as terrorism should be consistently addressed within the context of other issues that disrupt and destabilize society. Nations must look beyond responding separately to disparate problems and move towards the building of a comprehensive international order based on social justice and collective security.

SECURITY COUNCIL (5 167)

We acknowledge the need for urgent reform of the Security Coun— cil. The proposals in the report, however, do not ultimately address the democracy deficit and relentless politicization of the Security Council, Which thwart the execution of its duties and undermine the trust and respect it needs to exercise its mandate. To address these deficits, the United Nations must boldly and intelligently move towards adopting a procedure for eventually eliminating permanent membership and veto power.2

Freedom to live in dignity

RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT (5 135)

We strongly support the “emerging norm of the collective responsi— bility to protect” and accompanying efforts to establish a principled

[Page 274]274 THE BAHA’I’ WORLD 2004—2005

framework about how and when to intervene justly and effectively to protect human rights. We agree that no legal principle, not even sovereignty, should ever be allowed to shield genocide and human suffering. Indeed, the Baha’i Faith offers the concept of the oneness of humanity as an underlying principle of relations between states. Furthermore, we support the concept of a federated world polity responsive to the needs of an ever-changing world. The aim of such a polity, far from stifling intelligent patriotism or national autonomy, is rather the collective subordination of national impulses to the wider needs of an increasingly interdependent world.

The Baha’i writings assert that “the earth is but one country and mankind its citizens.”

HUMAN RIGHTS Human Rights Council (5 181—183)

We support the Secretary—General’s proposal to elevate the consid— eration of human rights to the same level accorded to security and socioeconomic development. In order to restore the effective func- tioning of the discredited Human Rights Commission, we support the creation of an elected, standing Human Rights Council and the elaboration of minimum criteria for membership. Candidates for membership in the Council should demonstrate strong adherence to human rights standards; specific criteria may include the ratifi— cation of key human rights documents or a statement of intent to do so Within a given period of time. Members of the Council that repeatedly Violate human rights should not be allowed to remain on the Council.

Ofic‘e oft/7e Hz'g/y Commissionerfor Human Rights (3 142—146)

We agree that the OHCHR is ill-equipped to respond effectively to the human rights Challenges facing the international community. As such, we support the Secretary-General’s call for more resources to train country teams within the OHCHR3 and urge the OHCHR to establish a strongfie/dpresmce at the country level, providing leader- ship and coordination on matters of promotion and protection of human rights. Second, Special Procedures should receive adequate budgetary and administrative support. Government cooperation with

[Page 275]RESPONSE TO IN LARGER FREEDOM 275

Special Procedures should not be limited to access, but should also include full implementation of recommendations made”

Third, the OHCHR should continue its productive engagement With NGOS, which has contributed positively to the work of the Office and to the development of NGO capacity to interact meaningfully in this context.S Fourth, the ambitious mandate of the OHCHR must be supported by appropriate budgetary resources.6 Fifth, the Public Information section of the OHCHR should be developed to allow resolutions of the Commission on Human Rights/Human Rights Council, recommendations of the Special Procedures and concluding observations of the treaty monitoring bodies to be accorded more prominence in the media.

DEMOCRACY (S 158—161)

We commend the Secretary General and the international com— munity for their commitment to democracy and to a freely elected government as a universal value. We support in principle the cre— ation of a democracy fund at the United Nations. At the same time, we note that democracy in its truest sense must be rooted in moral values, intertwined with responsibilities, and concerned With social welfare both within and beyond the nation state. Without this principled anchor, it is vulnerable to the excesses of unbridled individualism and nationalism, which tear at the fabric of the com- munity—both nationally and globally.

Other points for consideration at the Millennium + 5 Summit

That the Secretary-General chose to frame his report in the con— text of freedoms is significant. Certainly the want of freedom from fear, poverty, and oppression has been a dominant factor in the turmoil of the times. There is no doubt as to the high importance of freedoms to constructive social processes. Yet the freedoms with which we are privileged are concomitant with responsibility—the responsibility to exercise our freedoms in a way that enables all to attain to happiness and to fulfill their purpose in their individual life and in their collective functioning as a society. It is the abuse of freedoms and the denial of responsibilities with which elected and

[Page 276]276 THE BAHA’I’ WORLD 2004—2005

appointed officials at both national and international levels have been vested that must remain at the forefront ofdeliberations about United Nations reform.

FREEDOM OF RELIGION OR BELIEF

The Secretary—General’s report does not make mention of one of the central and most challenging issues shaping inter- and intra—state rela— tions today, namely the freedom of religion or belief. At a time when religious extremism, intolerance, and discrimination are threatening peace and security in many parts of the world, it is imperative for the United Nations to address this issue openly and earnestly. Until all people are free to openly practice and share their beliefs within the parameters of equally applied laws, as well as change their religion or belief system, development and peace will prove elusive.

CONDEMNING RELIGIOUS EXTREMISM AND TERRORISM

While the United Nations’ human rights machinery has been used to condemn religious intolerance and persecution, United Nations’ development policies and programs have barely begun to address religious extremism as a major obstacle to peace and well-being. Hesitancy to acknowledge and forcefully condemn the religious extremism motivating terrorist acts weakens the effectiveness of the UN’s efforts to bring an end to international terrorism. Only by identifying and understanding the motivation behind such acts can they be effectively combated.

We are grateful for the opportunity to submit the above com— ments. The Bahé’i’ International Community looks forward to being engaged in the debate and implementation of proposed reforms, with a View to creating a United Nations capable of meeting the changing needs and growing aspirations of the generality of humankind.

NOTES

1 Valuing Spirituality in Development: Initial Consideration: Regarding the

Creation of Spiritua/[y Based Indicators fbr Development. A concept paper written by the Bahé’i’ International Community for the World Faiths and Development Dialogue at Lambeth Palace, London. (Oakham: Bahé’i’ Publishing Trust, 1998).

Turning PointfiJrAll Nations. Bahé’l’ International Community United Na— tions Office, New York, 1995. An interim measure may include not using

[Page 277]RESPONSE TO [N LARGER FREEDOM 277

veto power when voting on questions of genocide or other gross threats to international peace and security.

In Larger Freedom: szmk Development, Security, and Human Rights fiir All, report of the Secretary-General, Para. I42. UN Doc. A/59/2005.

The OHCHR should take steps to bolster interactive dialogue with the Special Rapporteurs. The dialogues should include member states’ reports on the status of implementation of recommendations.

Similarly, NGO involvement in the work of the proposed Human Rights Council should not be diminished.

The core functions of the Office should be independent of voluntary contributions. Governments should decrease the percentage of earmarked funds, according mote latitude to the Office in determining its needs.